Catalog
1 Daalder "Leeuwendaalder" Wignacourt Countermark
| Issuer | Order of Malta (Knights Hospitaller) |
|---|---|
| Year | 1601-1622 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A rampant lion leaps to the left in bold relief, occupying the central field. The Wignacourt countermark — applied by the Order of Malta during the Grand Mastership of Alof de Wignacourt (1601–1622) — appears between the lion's legs and is typically accompanied by a test cut, a customary authentication mark found on counterstamped host coins. The Latin legend encircles the design, invoking divine protection. The overall execution reflects the standard Dutch Leeuwendaalder type widely circulated throughout the Mediterranean. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Alof de Wignacourt served as Grand Master from 1601 to 1622, and the Order's chronic shortage of circulating silver during his tenure led to the systematic countermarking of Dutch Leeuwendaalders rather than striking entirely new coinage. The Netherlands was flooding Mediterranean trade routes with these coins, making them the logical host for a Hospitaller mark that could assert local authority without the expense of a full mint operation.
The Dutch originals were themselves a trade coin engineered for export — deliberately debased slightly below domestic standard to discourage melting. That the Order chose to countermark rather than remint speaks directly to the financial constraints of maintaining both a naval fleet and the Valletta fortifications simultaneously.