Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Scotland |
|---|---|
| Year | 1716 |
| Type | Coin pattern |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Draped bust of James VIII (James Francis Edward Stuart, the Old Pretender) facing right, wearing a laurel wreath over flowing curled hair, rendered in the high-relief Baroque style characteristic of Norbert Roettiers. The effigy is finely detailed, with the drapery knotted at the shoulder visible at the bust truncation. The surrounding Latin legend reads IACOBVS VIII DEI GRATIA, separated by pellet stops, and the entire design is framed by a bold milled border of raised beads. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Milled |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
James Francis Edward Stuart — "the Old Pretender" — had this coinage prepared in 1716 in the immediate aftermath of the failed Jacobite rising of 1715, asserting his claim as James VIII of Scotland and III of England from exile in France. The pieces were never circulated; they functioned as diplomatic and propagandistic objects, distributed among sympathizers and foreign courts rather than through any monetary channel. The term "restrike" in the catalog literature reflects later reuse of the original dies, making precise attribution of any given example to 1716 production a genuine specialist problem.