See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Cash - Wanli Tongbao, with dot

Issuer Empire of China
Year 1576-1620
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Brass
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Central square perforation surrounded by four Chinese characters in kaishu (regular script), arranged in the traditional reading order: top, bottom, right, left — forming the reign title legend 萬曆通寶 (Wanli Tongbao). The boldly cast characters are well-defined against a flat inner field, enclosed within a raised inner rim bordering the central hole and a raised outer rim defining the coin's edge. The overall design is typical of Ming dynasty cast cash coinage, with clean, angular strokes characteristic of the Wanli period.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (1576-1620) - Hartill#20.142: Large dot above -
ND (1576-1620) - Hartill#20.143: Small dot above; Tong with one dot -
ND (1576-1620) - Hartill#20.143: Small dot above; Tong with two dots -
ND (1576-1620) - Hartill#20.144: Dot to the upper right -
ND (1576-1620) - Hartill#20.145: Dot below -
ND (1576-1620) - Hartill#20.146: Dot to the left -
Additional information

The Wanli reign (1572–1620) was among the most financially chaotic of the late Ming period. Emperor Shenzong's chronic withdrawal from court business — he refused audiences for over two decades — left the Board of Revenue largely ungoverned, and mint output became erratic across provincial facilities. The dot variety catalogued here under Hartill 20.142 distinguishes production from a specific furnace or supervisory workshop, a detail that mattered to Ming administrators tracking output accountability even as the central government functioned in name only.

By the early 1600s, silver had so thoroughly displaced brass cash in everyday commerce that these coins circulated primarily among the rural poor.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE