See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Cash - Anonymous Kaiyuan Tongbao, Lan

Issuer Empire of China
Year 841-907
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Central square hole (穿) surrounded by a raised inner rim and plain field. Four Chinese characters in clerical script (隸書) arranged in cruciform fashion around the central perforation, reading top-bottom and right-left: 開元通寶 (Kai Yuan Tong Bao). The characters are boldly cast in raised relief within a broad, flat field enclosed by a raised outer rim. The coin exhibits a characteristic late Tang casting style with relatively fine stroke definition.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Chinese (traditional, regular script)
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The Kaiyuan Tongbao series, introduced in 621 under Tang Taizong, became so dominant that later emperors simply continued striking it anonymously rather than issuing coins under their own reign titles — a practice essentially without precedent in Chinese monetary history. The "Lan" variety, identified by a crescent-shaped mark on the reverse, belongs to a classificatory system still not fully resolved among scholars; whether these marks denote specific mints, furnace supervisors, or batch controls remains contested. Hartill places this type firmly in the late Tang period, when central authority was fracturing under warlord pressure and regional mints operated with increasing independence.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE