Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Year | 250-325 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 4.99 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Bare or lightly draped bust of a youthful male ruler facing right, imitating the portrait style of Severus Alexander, set within a beaded border. The effigy displays simplified, somewhat barbarous engraving characteristic of Germanic imitative coinage, with a rounded skull and schematic facial features. A blundered pseudo-Latin legend surrounds the bust in the field, rendered in degraded imitation of imperial Roman titulature. The overall style reflects a provincial or tribal die-cutter working from a Roman prototype rather than official mint production. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Germanic imitations of Roman aurei occupy a narrow and poorly understood corner of numismatics. These pieces were not struck for circulation in any Roman sense — they functioned as prestige objects, gift currency, or diplomatic tokens within tribal hierarchies, often produced generations after the prototype had ceased to mean anything monetarily. The Severus Alexander aureus was a common model precisely because his reign produced abundant, well-distributed gold.
Attribution to specific tribal groups remains largely impossible without hoard provenance.