Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Year | 250-325 |
| Type | Non-circulating coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | OIHONOIIONOI |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (250-325) |
| Additional information |
Barbarian imitations of Roman aurei are poorly understood as a group, and those copying Elagabalus specifically present a dating problem — the prototype coins were already a generation or two old by the time Germanic goldsmiths began reproducing them. Whether these circulated as currency, functioned as prestige objects, or served votive purposes remains genuinely contested among specialists.
The Calicó reference here is comparative only, which is characteristic of the type: no two barbarian imitations are fully identical, and die links within the series are rare enough that individual pieces resist clean attribution to a specific workshop or tribe.