See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1 Ashrafi - Nasir-ud-Din Haidar Lucknow mint

Issuer Awadh
Year 1830-1837
Type Log in to see details
Value 1 Ashrafi (16)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Arabic
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The reverse displays dense Nastaliq calligraphic legends filling the entire field, with a prominent oval cartouche at the top enclosing the mint name. The central field contains multiple lines of Arabic script recording the mint name Lucknow (Dar al-Sultanat) and the regnal year, all enclosed within a plain linear inner border and a beaded outer rim consistent with the obverse. The deeply incised lettering exhibits the flowing, overlapping strokes characteristic of Awadh coinage of this period.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Nasir-ud-Din Haidar ruled Awadh as King — a title the British East India Company formally recognized in 1819 when his predecessor accepted a revised treaty — but real authority had long been hollowed out by subsidiary alliance. His reign was marked by personal eccentricity and fiscal extravagance that alarmed Company residents stationed in Lucknow. Gold ashrafis of this period were essentially court currency, struck for ceremonial presentation and royal nazrana rather than commercial exchange, which explains why survivors often appear in grades inconsistent with any genuine circulation history.

He died in 1837 under circumstances suspicious enough that the Company launched an inquiry, with poison strongly suspected.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE