See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

1/4 Rupee - Edward VII [Raghubir Singhji]

Issuer Bundi, Princely state of
Year 1906-1909
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight 2.8 g
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Central field dominated by a large stylized Devanagari inscription rendered in bold relief, reading the ruler's name or title in archaic script characters. The legend is arranged in a circular fashion around the central device, with heavily stylized letterforms characteristic of the local Bundi coinage tradition. The overall design reflects the continuation of pre-modern Indian princely state minting conventions adapted under British suzerainty during the Edwardian period.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage 1963 (1906) - -
1964 (1907) - -
1965 (1908) - -
1966 (1909) - -
Additional information

Bundi's coinage under Raghubir Singhji (r. 1889–1927) reflects the fractured monetary reality of Rajputana, where dozens of princely states retained the right to strike their own silver under British paramountcy, producing coins that were legally valid locally but practically useless beyond a day's travel. The Political Department in Delhi spent decades trying to consolidate these issues into the imperial system with limited success.

Bundi's dies were notably inconsistent across this period, and pieces from the 1906–1909 window frequently show misaligned or partially impressed strikes — a product of minimal mint infrastructure rather than any systematic problem.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE