Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Gwalior, Princely state of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1886 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | The obverse displays a stylized Mughal-derived design composed of bold raised pellets arranged in a conventional floral or plant-like pattern within the left portion of the field, alongside Arabic calligraphic elements occupying the right side within a recessed rectangular panel. A small circular device or mint mark appears in the lower left field. The overall composition is characteristic of the debased Mughal coinage tradition adopted by Gwalior princely state issues struck in the name of Shah Alam II. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Reeded |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Gwalior's late nineteenth-century rupee coinage presents one of the more tangled attribution problems in Indian princely numismatics. Issues struck in the name of the Mughal emperor Shah Alam II continued well after his death in 1806 — a frozen-legend convention that persisted across multiple princely mints for decades, rendering the regal year on the coin essentially meaningless as a dating tool. The 1886 Gregorian date assigned here derives from the Scindia administration's own records rather than anything the coin itself declares.
Madho Rao Scindia was a minor under British guardianship during most of this period, with the state managed by a council — a detail that occasionally influenced mint output volumes.