Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Principality of Monaco |
|---|---|
| Year | 1648-1651 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | The crowned arms of Monaco at centre, displaying the characteristic lozengy field of alternating argent and gules (rendered in silver and stippled engraving), surmounted by a princely crown adorned with floral finials. A scroll or cartouche bearing the motto DEO IVVAN is placed across the escutcheon. The surrounding circular legend reads DEO. IVVAN. DVX. VALENT. PAR FRANCIAE. & c., with the date 1649 incorporated within the legend at the upper left. The entire design is enclosed within a finely beaded inner border. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | DEO. IVVAN. DVX. VALENT. PAR FRANCIAE. & c. 1649 |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Honoré II secured the title "Prince of Monaco" from Louis XIII in 1612, ending decades of Spanish suzerainty — but the principality's coinage rights remained contested well into mid-century. These half-écus were struck during the final years of his reign, when Monaco was consolidating its identity as a sovereign French-aligned statelet squeezed between Savoy and the sea. The dies were almost certainly cut locally rather than by a royal French engraver, which accounts for the considerable variation in workmanship across surviving pieces.