Catalog
| Issuer | Phaselis (Lycia) |
|---|---|
| Year | 190 BC - 167 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | |
| Currency | Drachm |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | 4.79 g |
| Diameter | 18 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | Heipp-Tamer#B58 , Müseler Lycia#IX, , SNG Copenhagen#126 , BMC Greek#19 |
| Obverse description | Prow right; above, Nike flying right, crowning prow. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | Athena standing right, wielding thunderbolt and holding aegis. |
| Reverse script | Greek |
| Reverse lettering | ΦΒ |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (190 BC - 167 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 9842672510 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This Æ issue from Phaselis falls within a tumultuous period for Lycia, following the Roman victory over Antiochus III (190 BC). The Treaty of Apamea (188 BC) placed Lycia under Rhodian control, a move deeply resented by cities like Phaselis. This era of Lycian resistance culminated in the region's liberation from Rhodian suzerainty in 167 BC. This coin thus represents Phaselis's assertion of civic identity and economic activity during a critical transition from Seleucid influence to Rhodian subjugation, and ultimately, to greater autonomy under Roman oversight.
Artistry: Crafted by an anonymous engraver, typical of Hellenistic civic issues, the coin exhibits stylistic elements common to Lycian and broader Greek artistry. Phaselis bronzes often feature a prominent deity head, such as Artemis or Apollo, on the obverse, rendered with characteristic Hellenistic expressiveness. The reverse typically displays a civic emblem, perhaps a ship's prow reflecting Phaselis's maritime importance, executed with competent detail, balancing artistic convention with local identity.
Technical/Grading: This bronze issue, measuring 18mm and weighing 4.79 grams, is typical of Hellenistic civic bronzes. High-points for wear or strike weakness include the hair and facial features on the obverse portrait, and central elements of the reverse device. Strike quality can vary, with common issues being off-centering, slight weakness in peripheral areas due to uneven die pressure, or minor flan imperfections. Well-struck examples reveal crisp details, reflecting the engraver's skill despite bronze coinage challenges.