Catalog
| Issuer | Aineia |
|---|---|
| Year | 400 BC - 347 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | |
| Currency | Drachm |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | 2.02 g |
| Diameter | 12.5 mm |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) |
| Obverse description | Young, beardless male head (Askanios?) to right, wearing Phrygian cap. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | |
| Obverse lettering | |
| Reverse description | Forepart of a bull to right. |
| Reverse script | Greek |
| Reverse lettering | ΑΙΝΕΙ ΑΤΩΝ |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (400 BC - 347 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 1006922230 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This Æ issue from Aineia dates to a pivotal period in Greek history, 400-347 BC, coinciding with the rise of Macedonian power under Philip II. Aineia, a city in Macedon, maintained a degree of autonomy during this era, and its bronze coinage served vital local economic functions. These small denominations facilitated daily commerce, bridging the gap between high-value silver and the populace's need for small change, reflecting the city's self-governance before its eventual absorption into the Macedonian kingdom.
Artistry: The engraver of this particular Æ is unknown, a common circumstance for minor bronze issues of the Late Classical period. Stylistically, it adheres to the broader Greek tradition of idealized forms, even on a small module of 12.5mm. Typical designs for Aineia include the head of a nymph or the city's mythical founder, Aeneas. Despite the small canvas, the artistry aimed for clarity and recognition, often depicting local patron deities or symbols with a refined yet practical aesthetic suitable for widespread circulation.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 2.02 grams with a diameter of 12.5mm, this bronze coin exhibits characteristics typical of its era and denomination. High-points, such as hair details, facial contours, or raised elements of a symbolic design, are often susceptible to strike weakness or wear. Technical strike qualities on these Æ issues can vary significantly; off-center strikes, irregular flan shapes, and minor planchet flaws are common, reflecting the less meticulous production standards compared to silver coinage. A well-centered, fully struck example with minimal wear is highly desirable.