Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Tetradrachm Thasos Type

Uitgever Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Jaar 200 BC - 1 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Variable alignment ↺
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Heavily Celticised bearded head of Dionysos facing right, adorned with an ivy wreath rendered in a schematic, abstract style characteristic of late Celtic die-cutting. The facial features are boldly stylised, with the beard depicted as a series of deeply incised parallel strokes and the wreath reduced to schematic pellets and leaf forms. Vestiges of the original Thasian prototype lettering appear in the field as degenerate symbols, transformed into abstract geometric motifs by Celtic engravers. The overall execution reflects a high degree of artistic abstraction, departing significantly from the Hellenistic model while retaining the fundamental iconographic composition.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (200 BC - 1 BC)
Aanvullende informatie

The Thasian tetradrachm became the dominant trade coin across the middle Danube basin by the second century BC, and Celtic tribes in Thrace and Macedonia copied it so prolifically that the imitations eventually outnumbered the Thasian originals in circulation. This piece belongs to that sprawling tradition of Celtic "barbarous" coinage — derivative in origin but genuinely independent in execution, struck by groups whose identities remain unresolved despite decades of hoard analysis.

Attribution to a specific tribe is impossible without a secure hoard provenance. The Kostial and Castelin references place it within a broad typological family rather than a precise issuing authority.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT