Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Tetradrachm - Lysimachus Amphipolis

Uitgever Kings of Thrace
Jaar 288 BC - 281 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Variable alignment ↺
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Diademed head of Alexander the Great facing right, rendered in the heroic Hellenistic portrait tradition, with the distinctive horn of Ammon curling above his right ear — an iconographic device asserting divine descent from Zeus-Ammon. The fillet of the diadem trails behind the neck, and the portrait exhibits the characteristic upward gaze and tousled hair associated with official Lysimachean coinage. The field is plain, with no legend on the obverse.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Greek
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Lysimachus struck these tetradrachms at Amphipolis — a mint he seized from the Macedonian kingdom — during the final decade of his reign, when he controlled both Thrace and Macedonia simultaneously. The consolidation was short-lived. His alliance with Pyrrhus of Epirus collapsed, his son Agathocles was executed on suspicion of treason, and Lysimachus himself died at the Battle of Corupedium in 281 BC fighting Seleucus I. The Amphipolis mint ceased production under his name almost immediately after.

The Müller gap for this piece reflects ongoing attribution disputes that remain unresolved in the specialist literature.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT