Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Duchy of Carinthia (Austrian States) |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1200-1300 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Pfennig (800-1500) |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Half-length frontal effigy of a ruler or ecclesiastical figure, depicted in high relief in the Romanesque style, wearing a mail hauberk with horizontal rows of ringlets visible across the torso. The figure is shown raising a sword upright in the right hand, with the left side partially obscured. The composition is centered within the irregular flan, with no surrounding legend, consistent with the bracteate-influenced Pfennig tradition of the 13th-century Austrian lands. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The Pfennig Gutenwerth takes its name from the Augustinian monastery of Gurk-Gutenwerth, an island settlement on the Drava River that functioned as a minor but documented minting site during the fragmented coinage period of medieval Carinthia. Authority over coin production in the duchy during the thirteenth century was contested between episcopal and secular powers — the Bishops of Gurk and the Spanheim dukes each pressed competing claims — making precise attribution of bracteate and thin-flan issues from this region genuinely difficult. CNA classification places this piece within that contested attribution framework.