Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Pfennig Gutenwerth

Uitgever Duchy of Carinthia (Austrian States)
Jaar 1200-1300
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Pfennig (800-1500)
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Half-length frontal effigy of a ruler or ecclesiastical figure, depicted in high relief in the Romanesque style, wearing a mail hauberk with horizontal rows of ringlets visible across the torso. The figure is shown raising a sword upright in the right hand, with the left side partially obscured. The composition is centered within the irregular flan, with no surrounding legend, consistent with the bracteate-influenced Pfennig tradition of the 13th-century Austrian lands.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The Pfennig Gutenwerth takes its name from the Augustinian monastery of Gurk-Gutenwerth, an island settlement on the Drava River that functioned as a minor but documented minting site during the fragmented coinage period of medieval Carinthia. Authority over coin production in the duchy during the thirteenth century was contested between episcopal and secular powers — the Bishops of Gurk and the Spanheim dukes each pressed competing claims — making precise attribution of bracteate and thin-flan issues from this region genuinely difficult. CNA classification places this piece within that contested attribution framework.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT