See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Denier - Charlemagne Venasque

Issuer Unified Carolingian Empire
Year 771-793
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A bold, plain cross occupies the center of the field, its arms extending toward the border and dividing the flan into four quarters. The letters of the mint name VINSCO CI, an abbreviated form of Venasque (Civitas Vinascensis), are distributed within the four quadrants of the cross in characteristic Carolingian hammered style. A beaded border encircles the design. The overall composition follows the standard early Carolingian reverse type, with the cross serving both as a religious symbol and a structural device for the placement of the mint legend.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Venasque — now a quiet village in the Vaucluse — held sufficient ecclesiastical weight in the Carolingian period to operate its own mint, a privilege tied to its status as a bishop's seat predating the region's full Frankish integration. This denier belongs to the earliest phase of Charlemagne's monetary reform program, before the 793–794 reforms at Frankfurt standardized the silver content and weight across the empire. The Prou gap is telling: even the most comprehensive cataloguers of Carolingian coinage couldn't pin down a confirmed example, making the Nouchy and Depeyroux references the more reliable anchors for attribution.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE