Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Unified Carolingian Empire |
|---|---|
| Year | 768-814 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | The central field features the elaborate Carolingian royal monogram, composed of the interlaced letters of KAROLVS within a beaded inner circle, rendered in the distinctive Carolingian style with interlocking strokes forming a cross-like cipher. The peripheral legend ROTOMAGVS, denoting the mint of Rouen, encircles the monogram in bold hammered Latin capitals, with a small cross mark at the top serving as a stop. The overall design is characteristic of Charlemagne's monetary reform coinage, presenting the royal monogram as the principal device in lieu of a figurative portrait. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (768-814) |
| Additional information |
Charlemagne's monetary reform of c. 793–794, enacted through the Capitulary of Frankfurt, replaced the lighter Merovingian denier with a heavier silver standard — the same reform that established the pound-shilling-penny accounting system Europe would use for the next millennium. Rouen, as the administrative capital of Neustria and a major Loire trade hub, was among the active minting centers under this reorganization.
The Prou reference absence is worth noting: Prou's catalogue gaps for certain Carolingian mint attributions are well documented, and the Depeyroux number here carries the weight of the attribution.