See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Denier - Charlemagne Rouen

Issuer Unified Carolingian Empire
Year 768-814
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Silver
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The central field features the elaborate Carolingian royal monogram, composed of the interlaced letters of KAROLVS within a beaded inner circle, rendered in the distinctive Carolingian style with interlocking strokes forming a cross-like cipher. The peripheral legend ROTOMAGVS, denoting the mint of Rouen, encircles the monogram in bold hammered Latin capitals, with a small cross mark at the top serving as a stop. The overall design is characteristic of Charlemagne's monetary reform coinage, presenting the royal monogram as the principal device in lieu of a figurative portrait.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (768-814)
Additional information

Charlemagne's monetary reform of c. 793–794, enacted through the Capitulary of Frankfurt, replaced the lighter Merovingian denier with a heavier silver standard — the same reform that established the pound-shilling-penny accounting system Europe would use for the next millennium. Rouen, as the administrative capital of Neustria and a major Loire trade hub, was among the active minting centers under this reorganization.

The Prou reference absence is worth noting: Prou's catalogue gaps for certain Carolingian mint attributions are well documented, and the Depeyroux number here carries the weight of the attribution.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE