Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
50 Soles de Oro Overprinted on P#50
| Issuer | Banco Central de Reserva del Peru |
|---|---|
| Year | 1935 |
| Type | Standard circulation banknote |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Size | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Printer | Log in to see details |
| Designer(s) | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Dark blue intaglio design with two allegorical figures at centre. A red letterpress overprint, applied by the Banco Central de Reserva del Perú, restates the denomination as Cincuenta Soles Oro, revaluing the original 5 Libras Peruanas note for continued circulation under the reformed monetary system. |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Signature(s) | Log in to see details |
| Protection type | Watermark |
| Protection description | Log in to see details |
| Variants | Log in to see details |
| Comments |
P#58 is a transitional note — the underlying P#50 plate design was overprinted to convert existing stock into a new denomination or authorization series rather than commissioning an entirely new printing run. This was a cost-saving measure the Banco Central de Reserva employed during the mid-1930s, a period when Peru was still adjusting to the monetary restructuring that followed the Depression-era collapse of the Sol's external peg.
The American Bank Note Company had a long relationship with Lima through this period, supplying engraved intaglio work of consistently high quality. The overprint itself, however, is the detail worth examining — its registration and ink consistency vary enough between surviving examples to suggest the application was done in smaller batches rather than as a single unified run.