Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Byzantine Empire |
|---|---|
| Year | 527-565 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (527-565) |
| Additional information |
Carthage operated as a semi-autonomous mint under Byzantine administration, and its output consistently diverged from Constantinople's conventions in ways that still puzzle specialists. The Є II mark on this piece denotes the second officina at Carthage — a mint that Justinian re-established after the Vandal reconquest of 533–534, meaning any example predating that campaign belongs to a very narrow production window tied directly to the logistics of Belisarius's North African expedition.
The 5 nummi denomination saw almost no use in eastern mints by this period. Carthage kept striking them long after Constantinople had effectively abandoned the denomination in everyday accounting.