Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Iran |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1864 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Copper |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Persian |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | 1281 (1864) طهران |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Naser al-Din Shah's reign saw repeated attempts to rationalize Iran's chaotic coinage system, and this 1864 copper pattern sits within that broader effort — though "pattern" here likely means it never cleared the political and logistical hurdles required for actual production. The Toman itself was a unit of account more than a reliable denomination, with silver krans doing the real transactional work. A copper 2 Toman piece would have represented an unusual pairing of base metal with a high-value denomination, which may explain precisely why it remained a pattern.