Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Federal Republic of Germany |
|---|---|
| Year | 2000 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 10 Deutsche Mark (10 DEM) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A detailed architectural view of the Reichstag building in Berlin is depicted in the central and right portions of the field, shown in perspective with its classical columned facade and the modern glass dome added during its renovation. To the left, construction crane elements and scaffolding are rendered in a stylized manner, symbolising reconstruction and renewal. The vertical inscription '3.OKTOBER 1990 2000' appears along the left margin. The legend '10 JAHRE DEUTSCHE EINHEIT' is inscribed prominently in three lines in the upper right field. The composition as a whole commemorates the tenth anniversary of German reunification on 3 October 1990. |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Issued to mark the tenth anniversary of German reunification, which formally occurred on October 3, 1990, when the five reconstituted East German states acceded to the Federal Republic under Article 23 of the Basic Law — a legal mechanism that avoided the need for a new constitution and remains a point of debate among constitutional scholars to this day.