Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
1 Tremissis - Desiderius Treviso
| Uitgever | Lombard Kingdom under Desiderius |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 757-774 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Tremissis (653-774) |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Central rosette or wheel motif with radiating petals enclosed within a beaded inner circle, surrounded by a circular legend in Roman capitals. The design references Byzantine tremissis prototypes adapted to Lombard regional coinage. The lettering is irregular and somewhat retrograde in places, characteristic of the Treviso mint's output during the reign of Desiderius. The overall execution is compact and densely arranged within the small flan. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Desiderius ruled as the last Lombard king until Charlemagne's forces crossed the Alps and besieged Pavia in 773, ending over two centuries of Lombard dominance in Italy. Treviso, as a secondary mint under Desiderius, produced tremisses in notably small quantities — the MEC I gap reference reflects how poorly this specific mint attribution is documented in the major corpus, leaving Bernardi's systematic catalogue as the primary authority for this type.