Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1 Hvid - Hans Bergen

Uitgever Norway
Jaar 1483-1513
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde 1 Hvid (⅓)
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Within a beaded inner circle, a crowned royal monogram of King Hans (Johan/Hans) displayed within a shield occupies the central field. The monogram is rendered in Gothic style typical of late medieval Scandinavian coinage. A circular Latin legend in uncial lettering surrounds the inner beaded ring, with a second beaded ring forming the outermost border of the coin. The overall style is characteristic of late 15th- to early 16th-century Norwegian hammered silver coinage.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde h + IOhAnES D G REX nOR
(Translation: Hans, by Gods grace, King of Norway.)
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Hans of Denmark — who ruled Norway as a subordinate kingdom — issued this small silver coin through the Bergen mint during a reign marked by repeated conflict with the Hanseatic League, which itself controlled much of Bergen's commercial infrastructure at the time. The irony of a royal mint operating in a city where the Kontor effectively ran the waterfront was not lost on contemporaries.

The multiple catalog references reflect genuine scholarly disagreement over die attribution and chronology within this thirty-year span — Galster's two separate UU numbers alone suggest distinct emission phases that remain incompletely resolved.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT