目录
为什么需要注册?只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证!
| 正面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | Latin (uncial) |
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | CONSERVA · NOS · DNA · (Translation: Conserva Noster Domina Save us, Lady) |
| 边缘 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸币厂 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸造量 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 附加信息 |
The Bishopric of Dorpat — a Catholic ecclesiastical state centered on present-day Tartu, Estonia — was already under acute pressure from the Reformation and encroaching Muscovite power when this countermark was applied. Countermarking existing coin stock was a fiscal emergency measure, a way to extend the authority of a depleted mint without striking entirely fresh coinage. Dorpat's mint output in these years was irregular at best.
The Livonian context matters: the entire monetary system of the region was fragmenting in the early 1530s as the Teutonic Order's grip weakened. Bishop Johann Bey authorized this issue within a window of just three years before the diocese's political situation deteriorated beyond recovery.