Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Bishopric of Dorpat |
|---|---|
| Year | 1532-1534 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Silver (.930) |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin (uncial) |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | CONSERVA · NOS · DNA · (Translation: Conserva Noster Domina Save us, Lady) |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Bishopric of Dorpat — a Catholic ecclesiastical state centered on present-day Tartu, Estonia — was already under acute pressure from the Reformation and encroaching Muscovite power when this countermark was applied. Countermarking existing coin stock was a fiscal emergency measure, a way to extend the authority of a depleted mint without striking entirely fresh coinage. Dorpat's mint output in these years was irregular at best.
The Livonian context matters: the entire monetary system of the region was fragmenting in the early 1530s as the Teutonic Order's grip weakened. Bishop Johann Bey authorized this issue within a window of just three years before the diocese's political situation deteriorated beyond recovery.