目录
为什么需要注册?只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证!
| 正面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | Latin (uncial) |
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 边缘 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸币厂 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸造量 | ND (1530-1534) - Host coin dated 1526 - ND (1530-1534) - Host coin dated 1527 - ND (1530-1534) - Host coin dated 1528 - ND (1530-1534) - Host coin dated 1529 - ND (1530-1534) - Host coin dated 1530 - ND (1531-1534) - Host coin dated 1531 - ND (1532-1534) - Host coin dated 1532 - ND (1533-1534) - Host coin dated 1533 - ND (1534) - Host coin dated 1534 - |
| 附加信息 |
Dorpat's bishops operated their mint intermittently and under persistent political pressure from both the Livonian Order and the encroaching Reformation movement that would ultimately strip the see of its temporal authority by mid-century. This countermark issue reflects a specific administrative need to validate or redenominate coinage already in circulation — a practice the Bishopric resorted to rather than striking entirely fresh coin, likely due to constrained minting resources during a period of institutional instability.
The Haljak II and Neumann references place this among a tight cluster of authenticated countermarked pieces; genuine examples are infrequently encountered outside Baltic regional collections.