Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Republic of Costa Rica |
|---|---|
| Year | 1892 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Centavo (0.01) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | The reverse presents the denomination '1' above the inscription 'CENTAVO' and the date '1892' in the central field, all enclosed within a wreath of oak leaves tied at the base with a decorative bow. The wreath is rendered in fine relief with carefully detailed foliage. A beaded border follows the coin's rim, consistent with the obverse treatment, lending a neat and uniform appearance to this piedfort pattern piece. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | 1 CENTAVO 1892 |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Piedforts — coins struck at double or greater thickness on standard-diameter planchets — were almost exclusively produced as presentation or pattern pieces for official examination, never intended for circulation. The 1892 Costa Rican aluminium centavo piedfort is a rare survivor of that approval process, likely submitted to government officials evaluating aluminium as a coinage metal during a period when several Latin American nations were experimenting with the material as a cheaper alternative to copper. Aluminium coinage proposals were frequently rejected on practical grounds: the metal's light weight made it unpopular with the public and prone to counterfeiting in base alloys.